Re: 1.2 Namespaces: Open Office Specification Draft

From
Michael Brauer <>
Date
2004-02-23T14:47:34+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: 1.2 Namespaces: Open Office Specification Draft
Hi Patrick,

Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> The TODO note lists adding the namespace for "math," but we also import 
> "dc" (Dublin Core).

I've just added dc as a TODO.

> 
> BTW, as a matter of style, shouldn't the namespacess be listed in the 
> same order as they appear in the schema? I have no preference for which 
> one conforms to the other but this was raised as an issue on the 
> documentation I am writing for a schema that the SBL and the ABS 
> (American Bible Society) developed for Bible translations. A small thing 
> admittedly but I had to agree that it would improve the readability for 
> a user who was consulting the schema along with the documentation.

You are right. We should reorder the namespaces to reflect the order in 
which we describe their content.

> 
> Highly likely to be useful for a user who is reading the specification 
> document, less likely to be useful for other users. Have not checked 
> elsewhere in the documentation but might be a good practice to follow 
> for other such presentations.
> 
> Hope you are having a great day!
> 
> Patrick
> 
Best regards

Michael
-- 
Michael Brauer                                Phone:  +49 40 23646 500
Technical Architect Software Engineering      Fax:    +49 40 23646 550
StarOffice Applications
Star Office Software Entwicklungs GmbH
Sachsenfeld 4
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany                e-mail: