Re: [office] Sigh, one more typo?

Patrick,

Patrick Durusau wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> Was reading through the index section this weekend thinking about 
> something to propose for phase two when I ran across the following:
> 
> page 141, just after line 2706, the section header reads:
> 
> index scope (which is correct but the first line reads)
> 
> The text:index-source attribute determines....
> 
> Should read:
> 
> The text:index-scope attribute determines....
> 
> Sorry I did catch this earlier.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
> There is a 30 day public review before a Committee Draft can be 
> submitted to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS standard, for the 
> express purpose of making sure the draft "is as "clean" and complete as 
> possible before its acceptance as an OASIS Standard" (quote from the 
> website).
> 
> Might I suggest that the ballot proceed on the document "as is" and use 
> the upcoming 30 day review as a time to scout for other typos, etc.?
> 
> Does require another vote if we change the document but the current vote 
> gives public notice of the substantial progress of the TC over the past 
> year.

This sounds reasoable. We should discuss this in our con call today.
> 
> Hope everyone is having a great day!
> 
> Patrick
> 

Michael