Hi all,
David Faure wrote:
>>Another thing: for directories the example says manifest:media-type="".
>>The explanation for media-type in 16.6.3 doesn't say explicitely that directories
>>must be listed in the manifest, and they should have an empty media-type.
>>Can this be added?
>>
>>
>
>I think this was never discussed. What should be the media-type for directories?
>
>
Hmm, I'm surprised they have a media-type at all... Some inquiring
presents: In OOo, if a directory has semantics of its own (such as a
directory containing a sub-document), then it received a suitable media
type (e.g. that for the sub-document-type). Other directories which are
just there for administrative or convenience reason (such as Pictures/)
have no media type, which is written as an empty attribute. I'm not sure
if it would make sense to introduce a general-purpose directory media-type.
Sincerely,
Daniel
