Hello Mary,
Mary McRae wrote:
> Hello Michael and OpenDocument TC members:
>
> Below is the text of the draft submission to JTC1. This is an
> incomplete, internal draft, and we need everyone to review it and
> provide any feedback by Thursday (1 Sept) 10am EDT. At that point
> Jamie, Patrick Gannon and myself will combine edits and make the final
> submission.
>
> Please provide feedback to this list and cc:
>
My feedback is attached below.
Best regards
Michael
====
DRAFT Explanatory Report
[...]
> Open Document Format for Office Applications v1.0 Specification
> (short name: "OpenDocument v1.0")
>
> The relevant documentation is enclosed (in a ZIP file) with this
> communication. OpenDocument v1.0 is a Publicly Available
Attached is Committee Draft 3 of the OpenDocument specification. I would
have expected that the OASIS standard version of the OpenDocument
specification is attached.
The 2nd attachment (opendoc-jtc1-submit.zip) contains copies of the
extracted Relax-NG schema that actually belong to Committe Draft 2. The
included SXW-version of the specification is Committee Draft 3.
[...]
>
> OASIS enters into working agreements (as contemplated by JTC1
> criteria) with each organization to which it submits OASIS Standards,
> pursuant to our Liaison Policy [41. [The proposed form of agreement
> is attached as exhibit ___.] OASIS and its OpenDocument technical
It seems that there is a "]" missing.
[...]
>
> As noted above, OPASIS expects its technical committee to remain
> active and drive growth of the specification, bringing future major
> versions back to JTC1 at an appropriate stage of stability.
OASIS is misspelled.
