On Jan 20, 2006, at 12:02 PM, wrote:
> Can I get some +1's for adding this to the agenda for Monday?
I don't know much about this either, but I'll give you a +1.
I just Googled around a bit and am a little confused.
On one hand, I see some suggestions that the xsd:anyURI datatype is
IRI-compatible. If that's right, RELAX NG supports that out of the box,
so I imagine just changing the pattern for uris to use xsd:anyURI might
address the issue on that end. I don't remember the name of that
pattern, but IIRC it doesn't now use xsd:anyURI.
OTOH, I see in this Atom schema that they say:
> # Unconstrained; it's not entirely clear how IRI fit into
> # xsd:anyURI so let's not try to constrain it here
> atomUri = text
http://atompub.org/2005/08/17/atom.rnc
So that's one question to get a better answer for.
Not sure if there are other issues to worry about.
Bruce
