Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] Fw: [office-accessibility] Inclusionof tables in the .odp profile for presentations
Hi Lars, I have to agree with Malte here. Tables should behave as if they were part of the slide. A goal of this groups effort is to raise the bar on the accessibility and usability of presentations. As Malte indicates we introduce usability and accessibility problems on a number of levels. Users would find using an embedded OLE object for table as a step back from what they are accustomed to today. Cheers, Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441 "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.", Frost Malte Timmermann <> Malte Timmermann <> 02/24/2006 03:51 AM To Lars Oppermann <> cc Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <>, Yue MA <>, , Subject Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] Fw: [office-accessibility] Inclusion of tables in the .odp profile for presentations Bad thing with embedded object is - If you read the slide with AT, you can't read the content of OLE objects - Activation normally doesn't help here, you would have to read the content from OLE separately (Special OOo implementation of internal OLE objects could change that, but...) - You can't activate OLE in read-only documents - OLE objects can't grow while editing, which would be really bad for table editing Malte. Lars Oppermann wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Just a quick question here: is it, from an A11Y perspective absolutely > unacceptable to have embedded tables? If the application is able to > activate the embedded object in-place and the activated context is > sufficiently accessible... > > Also from a file-format perspective, the structural information would be > available, if the embedded table object is ODF. > > I understand, that this is not very lightweight. I would like to know > whether it has to be ruled out completely from an A11Y point of view. > > All the best, > /lars > > Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > >> Since not everyone is an accessibility expert - The reason we need a >> real table construct in presentations is that we need to be able to do >> structural navigation. We need to have row, column constructs, headers, >> etc. otherwise we have an inaccessible solution. We will also have to >> address keyboard navigation of tables once we have a "tables for >> presentations" specification. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Next in thread →
Next in month →