Chris Nokleberg <> wrote on
02/03/2006 03:58:34 PM:
> > That's fine with me. Whatever we end up with with needs
to be
> > formally specified, so unless we define the syntax of BNF in
a
> > self-contained way, we'll need to refer to an external standard.
> > Whether it is XML 1.1, or RFC 2234 isn't as important to me as
the
> > fact that we're following some authority.
>
> In case it has been forgotten, the OpenDocument 1.0 spec already
> includes a BNF for the draw:formula attribute. The spreadsheet formula
> spec should probably use the same BNF syntax. The obvious problem
being
> that the syntax of the BNF used for draw:formula is not specified.
>
Good catch. 9.5.5 "Enhanced
Geometry". No authority cited there. But certainly makes
sense that all BNF's in ODF should use the same syntax.
-Rob
