ODF 1.0 has passed step #6 already. I understand your question to mean where the process for ODF 1.1 should start. I expect that to be step #1.
Waldo Bastian
Linux Client Architect - Channel Platform Solutions Group
Intel Corporation - http://www.intel.com/go/linux
OSDL DTL Tech Board Chairman
________________________________________
From: [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 6:18 AM
To: OpenDocument Mailing List
Subject: Re: [office] OASIS process
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <> wrote on 03/17/2006 06:59:20 AM:
>
> 1. The OpenDocument TC approves a specification as committee draft.
> 2. A public review of the committee draft takes place for a minimum
> of 60 days.
> 3. If comments are received that require a change of the specification, the
> spcification is changed accordingly, and a public review of the changes takes
> place for 15 days. This step may be repeated.
> 4. The TC approves the specification as committee specification.
> 5. The TC submits the Committee Specification to the membership of OASIS for
> consideration as an OASIS Standard. This submission must be requested by the
> 15th of a month.
> 6. Starting at the 1st of the next month, the voting takes place.
So, the question is this: If we make changes to ODF 1.0 in response to comments, does this send us back to step #1? Or does that send us back to step #3?
-Rob
