On 22/03/06, Charles-H.Schulz <> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> Well, I think you're right to the point, Daniel. In theory every
> possible character can be represented in UTF-8.
> Politely put, I would just say that this is true, although it is not
> always done properly. In short, UTF -8 is supposed to do that, but
> sometimes it actually fails to provide a correct rendering of
> characters...
The encoding has little, if anything, to do with the rendition
of glyphs.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
