Re: [office] Important question from Accessibility SC

From
Richard Schwerdtfeger <>
Date
2006-04-26T18:19:36+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [office] Important question from Accessibility SC
Since we are proposing <svg:desc> for long descriptions we would be proposing <svg:title> for the alternative text.

Rich Schwerdtfeger

Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist

Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review  Board

blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - 

I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.", Frost

"Gary Edwards" <>

"Gary Edwards" <> 

Sent by: 

04/26/2006 11:43 AM

To



cc

Nathaniel S Borenstein/Concord/IBM@IBMUS, , Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, 

Subject

Re: [office] Important question from Accessibility SC

+1 adding an Attribute

Would this alt attribute also mean that ODF is "optimized for processing"?  Like those guys over at ECMA? :)

~ge~

On 4/26/06, Patrick Durusau <> wrote:
Nathaniel,

Good question!

In terms of "textual description" I am not sure that reuse of draw:name,

for example, would be appropriate. Those attributes already have

legitimate uses and "reuse" might step on some of those uses. 

With that in mind, I think adding an attribute would be the best way to

handle this issue.

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

Nathaniel S Borenstein wrote:

>

> The accessibility committee has a question that it wishes to pose to 

> the full TC.

>

> There are several places where ODF currently lacks a way to specify an

> alternative textual description of a non-textual object.  In such

> cases, we could either invent a new tag or reuse an existing tag in 

> what seems (to us) to be a reasonable way.  In particular, we're

> wondering whether or not we can simply use draw:name, svg:desc, and

> office:name for such a purpose.  Would the TC recommend doing so, or 

> would it be preferable for us to create a new tag such as svg:title?

>  Obviously either approach will work, but we aren't sure which is

> better.  All opinions are invited.  -- Nathaniel

-- 

Patrick Durusau



Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface

Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model

Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005 

Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

-- 

Gary Edwards

The OpenDocument Foundation, Inc.

Redwood City, CA USA 94063

(650) 365-0899

(650) 888-2268 c.



http://OpendocumentFoundation.us

Founding member of the OASIS OpenDocument TC, representing the OpenOffice.org Community

Founding member of  the OpenDocument Foundation, Inc. - a USA 501c(3) non profit chartered in the public interest to support, develop and promote the OASIS OpenDocument XML file format.