Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] Accessibility SC Proposal for alternative text

On May 4, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Peter Korn wrote:

> By all means, please suggest alternative solutions to the ones we  
> suggest.

I dug out an example from Florian*, since it's easier for me to see the  
XML.

So here's what we have now from that message:

<text:p>
   <draw:frame>  <!-- outer frame -->
     <draw:text-box>
       <text:p>
         <draw:frame>
           <draw:image>
             <office:binary-data>picture data  
here....</office:binary-data>
           </draw:image>
         </draw:frame> <!-- "real"frame -->
         Caption Text
       </text:p>
     </draw:text-box>
   </draw:frame>
</text:p>

I agree, that's problematic, and not only for accessibility.

My understanding is that the proposal would do something like:

<text:p>
   <draw:frame>  <!-- outer frame -->
     <draw:text-box>
       <draw:frame>
         <draw:image draw:describedBy="caation-1">
           <office:binary-data>picture data here....</office:binary-data>
         </draw:image>
       </draw:frame> <!-- "real" frame -->
       <text:p xml:id="caption-1">Caption Text</text:p>
     </draw:text-box>
   </draw:frame>
</text:p>

Is that all correct?

Bruce

*  
<http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office-accessibility/200603/ 
msg00013.html>