Sorted Comments on ODF

Greetings!

Well, sans all the commentary it is down to 4 pages. Editorial changes, 
for those who are interested, ;-), start on page 3.

Realize this is very rough and largely based on the analysis I did over 
the last several days rather hurriedly.

I do think we should be able to cover all substantive matters and 
clarifications in the version to include accessibility. Including the 
use of a new control language (must, should, etc.). As soon as we finish 
the disposition version I will create a KWIC (key word in context) 
concordance and see if I can revise the control language to match that 
of ISO. It is really more tedium than anything else until you run across 
a should that really means may. Sorry, automated systems need not apply. 
;-)

Comments and suggestions most welcome!

BTW, if your post is on a particular comment, say for example, UK 10, 
please use that for the subject line. It will help all of us to keep 
track of the traffic since we are on a short editorial cycle.

Hope everyone is at the start of a great week!

Patrick


-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005

Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!