← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
Possible erratum for sub-tables
A colleague brought this to my attention.
Take a look at the "sample 1" illustration in the "Example
of Representation of a subtable" (section 8.2.6, or page 191 of the
PDF version of ODF 1.0). Compare the way the cells are numbered to
the way cell addresses are described in section 8.3.1 (page 194 of the
PDF).
If I'm reading 8.3.1 correctly, the
example in 8.2.6 is incorrect. The subtable cells illustrated should
be addressed B2.A1, B2.B1 and B2.A2. Also, we should include the
table name ('Table 1'.B2.A1) or at least a leading "." in the
cell addresses.
Am I understanding this correctly?
Regards,
-Rob
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →