Hi Michael,
Probably using v1.0ed2 would be less confusing as a file name, but I don't see
any reason for having to recreate and reupload.
m
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 10:24 AM
> To:
> Cc: 'James Bryce Clark'; Mary McRae
> Subject: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification
>
> All,
>
> the committee specification ballot for OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd
> edition) is closed now, and it is my understanding that
> OpenDocument v1.0 (end edition) has been approved as a
> committee specification.
>
> I therefore have made the adaptions to the specification
> title pages and document identifiers. The OpenDocument v1.0
> (2nd edition) Committee Specification is now available in
> ODT, tagged PDF and HTML format at:
>
> ODT:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19271/OpenDo
> cument-v1.0-cs2.odt
>
> tagged PDF:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19270/OpenDo
> cument-v1.0-cs2.pdf
>
> HTML (zipped):
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19269/OpenDo
> cument-v1.0-cs2.zip
>
> I have chosen "cs2" within the identifier to reflect that
> this is the 2nd edition of OpenDocument v1.0. Mary, please
> let me know if you think another identifier would be more apropriate.
>
> Best regards
>
> Michael
