RE: ISO/IEC 26300 (spec publication details)

Hello colleagues:

   This morning I received the message below from ISO's publications
editing managers, who also handle publication processing for JTC1.
Others received a copy due to their JTC1 capacities. I am forwarding
this to you to advise you and permit reactions, if anyone has them,
in the next 24-48 hours, before we respond.
   I will coordinate our proposed response with Michael B. as TC chair
and Patrick D. as co-editor, and provide a copy to this list.
   Kind regards Jamie

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: ISO/IEC 26300 (spec publishing issues)
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:40:48 -0700
From: James Bryce Clark <>
To: Richard Cook
CC: * * *

   Thank you Richard.  As a matter of form I wish to pass this
along, for brief consultation with the OASIS TC drafting group,
before replying, and so will revert to you within a day or
two.  Kind regards Jamie

~ James Bryce Clark
~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS
~ 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: ISO/IEC 26300
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:47:25 +0200
From: Richard Cook
To: 'James Bryce Clark' <>
CC: * * *

Dear Jamie,

This document will be published on CD-ROM. It appears that the names 
of the
.html and .odt files that will accompany the .pdf publication on the 
CD are
too long and contain non-authorized characters (see Clause 5 of the 
attached
ISO/CS requirements). Can we go ahead and change the file names in
accordance with these rules, or are there links between any of these 
files
that will be affected by this ?

Best regards,

Richard Cook
Technical Editor
IT, transportation, logistics and security
Standards Department
ISO Central Secretariat
* * *

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:]
Sent: 2006-08-31 03:05
To: 
Cc: 'G. Ken Holman - ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 Secretary'; 
Subject: Re: ISO/IEC 26300

Cook wrote:
> Dear Jamie,
> We have received the above document for publication in three
> formats: .odt, .pdf and .html.
> It is our intention to publish in .pdf with the addition of an ISO/IEC 
> Foreword and with ISO/IEC copyright instead of OASIS.
> Please confirm asap that this is acceptable to you.
> Best regards,
>
> /Richard Cook //Technical Editor IT, transportation, logistics and 
> security Standards Department// ISO Central Secretariat/ * * *  

Thank you, Richard. For verification purposes: the authoritative PDF
file from OASIS that you should have is named
"OpenDocument-v1.0ed2-cs1.pdf", and a copy of its first page is
attached. This is the correct, post-ballot version. Please do let me
know if you have something different.

      Your plans are confirmed * * *