On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:02 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 -
Hamburg wrote:
> The reason we are using our own namespaces for SVG, SMIL and XSL-FO
> are not validation problems, but that these specifications do not
> contain schema modules that we may include. In particular, they do not
> define global attributes, but all attributes do only exist for
> specific elements.
Question: is it the case that they simply by oversight "do not define"
these global attributes (as I would guess), or is there a sound
technical reason for it (which I'd guess not)?
If the former, then it might be worth revisiting again going forward?
Bruce
