On 13/11/06, Michael Brauer <> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my assumption is that the xml:id attribute the the advantage that it is
> understood as an attribute of type ID even by applications that are not
> schema aware. If that assumption is correct, then I think we should in
> fact consider to add xml:id attributes.
Which could add to the confusion?
I would then have even more namespace:id attributes.
If the various id attributes are indeed *meant* to be xml:id
then it might be reasonable to change them all to xml:id
That would seem logical and consistent, aiding clarity.
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
