James, TC members,
James: Thank you very much for this update.
TC members: I will put the question how we proceed with ODF1.1 regarding
ISO on the agenda of our call on Monday.
Best regards
Michael
James Bryce Clark wrote:
> As you may know, ISO has changed the visible status of OpenDocument v1
> as approved (ISO/IEC 26300) to correctly reflect its International
> Status standard, "60.00" in its harmonized stage coding. This can be
> seen by searching for "26300" in the ISO search function, after
> selecting "Search options > ISO number" and "Items to show > Both", at
> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueListPage.CatalogueList?&scopelist=ALL.
>
> Another way into this data is the following compound search results URI:
> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/catsupport/StandardsQueryFormHandler.StandardsQueryFormHandler?scope=ALL&keyword=&isoNumber=26300&sortOrder=ISO&title=true&search_type=ISO&search_term=26300
>
>
> A table of the stage codes appears here:
> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/widepages/stagetable.html
>
> When the IS is released for official publication in a few weeks, that
> status code will be upgraded to "60.60" to reflect the availability of
> copies for sale at the ISO web store.
>
> Likely our next topic, regarding ISO/IEC JTC1, will be what to advise
> them regarding v1.1 (which you've completed and are balloting now,
> congratulations) and v1.x/2.0. We've indicated that we plan to bring
> back appropriately stable revisions to JTC1. So the question will be
> which next version is "appropriately stable." Based on preliminary
> chats with several of you, it's my understanding is that v1.1 is
> unlikely to be suggested for resubmission.
>
> Kind regards JBC
>
> ~ James Bryce Clark
> ~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS
> ~
