RE: [office] ISO/IEC 26300

From
Mason, James David \(MXM\) <>
Date
2006-12-04T20:41:57+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [office] ISO/IEC 26300
Yep. As my earlier message indicated, we asked for "freely 
available" because it wasn't ISO's IP that was being processed but OASIS's. That 
means we can post it to the Web. But ISO can still charge their normal 
(exorbitant) rates for paper copies.

 

Jim

From:  
[mailto:] 
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:28 
AM
To: 
Cc: James Bryce Clark; Mary 
McRae; Michael Brauer; ; 

Subject: Re: [office] ISO/IEC 
26300

I was thinking of this ballot we had 
in SC34:  http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0765.htm 

Doesn't this call for the finalized specification to be 
made "freely-available"?   

-Rob

Patrick Durusau 
<> wrote on 12/01/2006 10:17:37 AM:

> 
Rob,
> 
> Hmmm, can't say I have ever heard of a "cost free" 
standard out of ISO.
> 
> ISO has complained to Jim Mason about his 
posting final versions of SC 
> 34 standards to his website. He does so on 
the basis that any activity 
> that the US Gov. participates in means the 
result is a royalty free 
> publication.
> 
> Since he is 
behind heavily guarded walls at a place that makes nuclear 
> weapons, ISO 
has not pressed the issue. ;-)
> 
> I can ask Jim about posting the 
final version to one of his webservers. 
> Would that work for 
you?
> 
> Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend!
> 

> Patrick
> 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
>
> > Good news, and thanks to Patrick, Michael and Jamie for all of 
your 
> > hard work during this process.
> >
> > Is 
there anything additional we can do to make this specification cost 
> 
> free in ISO?  I've seen this done with other standards out of JTC1. 

> >  Do you know how this is triggered?  
> 
>
> > -Rob
> >
> > Patrick Durusau 
<> wrote on 12/01/2006 08:17:11 AM:
> 
>
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Well, a bit 
early but should put a smile on everyone's face for the
> > > 
upcoming holiday season!
> > >
> > > 
Congratulations!
> > >
> > > Hope you are having a great 
day! (You have certainly made mine a 
> > great one!)
> > 
>
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > Michael 
Brauer wrote:
> > >
> > > > All:
> > > 
>
> > > > the status of ISO/IEC 26300 is now 60.60.
> 
> > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > 
>
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > 
> James Bryce Clark wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> 
  As you may know, ISO has changed the visible status of 
> > 
OpenDocument
> > > >> v1 as approved (ISO/IEC 26300) to 
correctly reflect its 
> > International
> > > >> 
Status standard, "60.00" in its harmonized stage coding.  This 
> 
> can be
> > > >> seen by searching for "26300" in the ISO 
search function, after
> > > >> selecting "Search options > 
ISO number" and "Items to show > Both",
> > > >> at
> 
> > >> 
> > 
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueListPage.CatalogueList?&scopelist=ALL.
> 
> > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>   
Another way into this data is the following compound search 
> > 
results
> > > >> URI:
> > > >> 
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/catsupport/StandardsQueryFormHandler.
> > 
> StandardsQueryFormHandler?
> > > 
> > 
> 
scope=ALL&keyword=&isoNumber=26300&sortOrder=ISO&title=true&search_type=ISO&search_term=26300
> 
> > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>   
A table of the stage codes appears here:
> > > >> 
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/widepages/stagetable.html
> > > 
>>
> > > >>   When the IS is released for official 
publication in a few weeks,
> > > >> that status code will be 
upgraded to "60.60" to reflect the
> > > >> availability of 
copies for sale at the ISO web store.
> > > >>
> > 
> >>    Likely our next topic, regarding ISO/IEC JTC1, will 
be what to
> > > >> advise them regarding v1.1 (which you've 
completed and are balloting
> > > >> now, congratulations) and 
v1.x/2.0.  We've indicated that we plan to
> > > >> bring 
back appropriately stable revisions to JTC1.  So the question
> > 
> >> will be which next version is "appropriately stable."  Based 
on
> > > >> preliminary chats with several of you, it's my 
understanding is that
> > > >> v1.1 is unlikely to be 
suggested for resubmission.
> > > >>
> > > 
>>     Kind regards JBC
> > > >>
> > 
> >> ~ James Bryce Clark
> > > >> ~ Director of 
Standards Development, OASIS
> > > >> ~ 

> > > >
> > > >
> 
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > 
>
> > > --
> > > Patrick Durusau
> > > 

> > > Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and 
Publishing Systems Interface
> > > Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps 
-- Reference Model
> > > Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of 
Directors, 2003-2005
> > >
> > > Topic Maps: Human, not 
artificial, intelligence at work!
> > >
> > >
> 

> 
> -- 
> Patrick Durusau
> 

> Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing 
Systems Interface
> Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference 
Model
> Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 
2003-2005
> 
> Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at 
work! 
> 
>