I was thinking of this ballot we had
in SC34: http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0765.htm
Doesn't this call for the finalized
specification to be made "freely-available"?
-Rob
Patrick Durusau <> wrote
on 12/01/2006 10:17:37 AM:
> Rob,
>
> Hmmm, can't say I have ever heard of a "cost free" standard
out of ISO.
>
> ISO has complained to Jim Mason about his posting final versions of
SC
> 34 standards to his website. He does so on the basis that any activity
> that the US Gov. participates in means the result is a royalty free
> publication.
>
> Since he is behind heavily guarded walls at a place that makes nuclear
> weapons, ISO has not pressed the issue. ;-)
>
> I can ask Jim about posting the final version to one of his webservers.
> Would that work for you?
>
> Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend!
>
> Patrick
>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Good news, and thanks to Patrick, Michael and Jamie for all of
your
> > hard work during this process.
> >
> > Is there anything additional we can do to make this specification
cost
> > free in ISO? I've seen this done with other standards out
of JTC1.
> > Do you know how this is triggered?
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> > Patrick Durusau <> wrote on 12/01/2006
08:17:11 AM:
> >
> > > Michael,
> > >
> > > Well, a bit early but should put a smile on everyone's face
for the
> > > upcoming holiday season!
> > >
> > > Congratulations!
> > >
> > > Hope you are having a great day! (You have certainly made
mine a
> > great one!)
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > > Michael Brauer wrote:
> > >
> > > > All:
> > > >
> > > > the status of ISO/IEC 26300 is now 60.60.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > James Bryce Clark wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> As you may know, ISO has changed the visible
status of
> > OpenDocument
> > > >> v1 as approved (ISO/IEC 26300) to correctly reflect
its
> > International
> > > >> Status standard, "60.00" in its harmonized
stage coding. This
> > can be
> > > >> seen by searching for "26300" in the
ISO search function, after
> > > >> selecting "Search options > ISO number"
and "Items to show > Both",
> > > >> at
> > > >>
> > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueListPage.CatalogueList?&scopelist=ALL.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Another way into this data is the following
compound search
> > results
> > > >> URI:
> > > >> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/catsupport/StandardsQueryFormHandler.
> > > StandardsQueryFormHandler?
> > >
> >
> scope=ALL&keyword=&isoNumber=26300&sortOrder=ISO&title=true&search_type=ISO&search_term=26300
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> A table of the stage codes appears here:
> > > >> http://www.iso.org/iso/en/widepages/stagetable.html
> > > >>
> > > >> When the IS is released for official publication
in a few weeks,
> > > >> that status code will be upgraded to "60.60"
to reflect the
> > > >> availability of copies for sale at the ISO web
store.
> > > >>
> > > >> Likely our next topic, regarding ISO/IEC
JTC1, will be what to
> > > >> advise them regarding v1.1 (which you've completed
and are balloting
> > > >> now, congratulations) and v1.x/2.0. We've
indicated that we plan to
> > > >> bring back appropriately stable revisions to JTC1.
So the question
> > > >> will be which next version is "appropriately
stable." Based on
> > > >> preliminary chats with several of you, it's my
understanding is that
> > > >> v1.1 is unlikely to be suggested for resubmission.
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards JBC
> > > >>
> > > >> ~ James Bryce Clark
> > > >> ~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS
> > > >> ~
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Patrick Durusau
> > >
> > > Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems
Interface
> > > Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
> > > Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
> > >
> > > Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
> > >
> > >
>
>
> --
> Patrick Durusau
>
> Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
> Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
> Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
>
> Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
>
>
