On Jan 29, 2007, at 3:14 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 -
Hamburg wrote:
> I would suggest "under discussion", because if you want to make
> changes to it, then it needs to be re-approved.
And how would you suggest handling this? Can I present a proposal with
the suggested changes to the already approved one? They are minor
changes.
If yes, when would be reasonable to put that on the agenda?
I want agreement that the citation field goes in 1.2. It's been sitting
on the sidelines for too long.
Bruce
