Dave,
Dave Pawson wrote:
> On 20/02/07, Patrick Durusau <> wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> Should have checked my email archives *before* hitting the send button.
>>
>> The concern is not with "em" but with "pt."
>>
>> As reported by my friend Martin Bryan from the UK:
>>
>> >Also I'm a printer, so the term pt raises a rag to a bull. Do you mean
>> >1/72nd of an inch used in modern copires, the Anglo/American point
>> used in
>> >printing in the US and UK or the European Diderot point?
>
>
> Since that is another fixed size unit which is wholly screen dependent
> I'd support dropping pt support, as per other specs.
>
Err, "wholly screen dependent"?
I understand that it is a printing measurement.
I don't think it is a question of "dropping pt support" as much as it is
enabling users to register the choices they made for printing of the
material. Yes?
Hope you are having a great day!
Patrick
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Member, Text Encoding Initiative Board of Directors, 2003-2005
Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!
