Re: [office] Digital signature proposal

Uri,

I think there is some mis-understanding. My question was not whether we 
should or should not have visual signatures. My question was whether we 
could agree on the current digital signature proposal, and still could 
add visual signatures later. My understanding is that this is the case.

Best regards

Michael

Uri Resnitzky wrote:
> Michael Brauer wrote:
>> I have read through your suggestion, and it seem to me that 
>> if one would specify a visual signature as described by you, 
>> it still would be an extension of the current proposal. Do you agree?
> I agree in the sense that your document signatures are a special case of
> the visual signatures that I propose. Therefore I see no reason not to
> adopt the visual signatures and that will cover your suggestion as well.
> 
> - Uri


-- 
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          
http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS