On Monday 16 April 2007 09:44, Florian Reuter wrote:
> Oliver is not very precise here. A better statement would be
> <revised>
> Thus, the same XML fragment will be interpreted differently in ODF 1.1
> and ODF 1.2 with Proposal Two when Olivers' understand of ODF1.1 lists
> is used. </revised>
> However exactly this case is not specified by ODF1.1. Its also worth
> mentioning that Olivers' understanding of ODF1.1 lists contradicts e.g.
> with OOo's understanding of ODF1.1 lists.
For a fact I know that what your proposal states means the way that
KOffice does lists is completely wrong. In other words; your proposal
would make documents created in koffice fail to comply.
And may I say that I if someone employed by Sun and working on lists
states that the current way of using lists is X and you are stating that
to not be true. Then without looking at the tiny details; I'm certainly
inclined to believe the technician that works on the code.
Anyway; I read the both proposals and the comparison;
my comparison would be really really simple:
Propsal by Florian changes behavior incompatible with existing
behavior, proposal by me/Oliver writes down the existing behavior and
expands on that.
Is there anything more that is relevant?
--
Thomas Zander
