Title: 邮件
Interoperability is the most important thing for ODF nowadays.
It should be the "next big thing".
The only
problem is: this SC should be within ODF TC, or ODF Adoption
TC?
-Alex
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday,
May 07, 2007 4:44 AM
To:
Subject: [office] How about an
interoperability Subcommittee?
At the
OASIS Symposium, and on the ODF Adoption TC calls, there has been a good
amount of talk about ODF & interoperability. This topic arises in a
variety of forms:
1)
Interoperability among ODF implementations, both traditional client-based
editors (OpenOffice.org, KOffice, etc.) as well as with nontraditional
editors, e.g., Google Docs & Spreadsheets
2) Interoperability between ODF and other embedded markups, like
MathML, XForms, etc.
3)
Interoperability between ODF and other high-level document formats, like
DocBook, DITA or UOML.
4) Best
practices for interoperability between ODF and embeddable microformats like
vCard or Creative Commons licensing.
5) Interoperability between ODF and legacy document formats from
Microsoft, Corel, Lotus, etc.
It
seems to me that these topics may be "next big thing" after the ODF 1.2 work
is done.
Is there any interest
among TC members in pursuing some of these topics in more depth in a
subcommittee?
Possible
deliverables of the subcommittee might be a technical report on best practices
for interoperability, as well as specific recommendations for accomplishing
these goals.
If there is
any interest in this, I suggest we discuss on the list and develop a charter
and list of deliverables.
-Rob
___________________________
Rob Weir
Software
Architect
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Software
Group
email:
phone: 1-978-399-7122
blog:
http://www.robweir.com/blog/
