Re: language

Hmm, this is a little tricky; going to cc this to the list in case 
anyone else has thoughts ...

On Jun 27, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Svante Schubert wrote:

> Which version do prefer, the third is currently in the spec:
>
> "The odf:Package resource description in the metadata manifest 
> represents the OpenDocument package itself."
> or
> "The odf:Package node in the metadata manifest represents the 
> OpenDocument package itself."
> or
> "The odf:Package in the metadata manifest represents the OpenDocument 
> package itself."

The problem is that you are assuming a particular syntax;

<odf:Package>
...
</odf:Package>

... rather than:

<rdf:Description>
   <rdf:type rdf:resource="[uri]"/>
</rdf:Description>

To "odf:Package node" in the second case wouldn't make sense. To be 
more precise, maybe something like:

"The odf:Package class refers to the OpenDocument package itself."

Bruce