On Tue, 2007-19-06 at 14:31 -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Andreas J Guelzow <> wrote:
>
> > Based on the examples in msg00048.html, the discussion _is_ subtables
> > per se. The proposed "solution" does not involve any subtables.
>
> What about the "table 2" example?
>
> The document is a little confusing.
I am understanding the document to say that Table 2 is the deprecated
(since "inaccessible") version. I thought Table 1 is the desired
presentation (and that does not include a subtable).
Andreas
