Patrick Durusau wrote:
>> I don't know. A user shouldn't care how the preview is stored, even
>> if they might want to choose the size at which it's displayed. I
>> don't think you want a situation where one implementation does
>> 32x32 and another does 256x256?
>>
> Sorry, why would that be a problem?
If a 32x32 image gets scaled to 256x256 it looks really bad?
> Any image support is going to support images of varying sizes
> anyway. What do we gain by setting a size?
I don't have a super strong opinion on this, but it seems to me the
preview ought not be too small. So maybe not setting a precise size, but
at least a minimum, or a suggested size?
Bruce
