Hi Thomas,
I didn't ;-).
A shape can also contain a "draw-frame". So its a generalization which is completely backward compatible:
<define name="shape">
<choice>
<ref name="draw-rect"/>
<ref name="draw-line"/>
<ref name="draw-polyline"/>
<ref name="draw-polygon"/>
<ref name="draw-regular-polygon"/>
<ref name="draw-path"/>
<ref name="draw-circle"/>
<ref name="draw-ellipse"/>
<ref name="draw-g"/>
<ref name="draw-page-thumbnail"/>
<ref name="draw-frame"/>
<ref name="draw-measure"/>
<ref name="draw-caption"/>
<ref name="draw-connector"/>
<ref name="draw-control"/>
<ref name="dr3d-scene"/>
<ref name="draw-custom-shape"/>
</choice>
</define>
~Florian
>>> Thomas Zander <> 07/19/07 5:55 PM >>>
On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:04:21 Florian Reuter wrote:
> please find attached a proposal to enhance hyperlinks to support shapes
> in general and not only frames.
Why did you remove the option to link to frames in your proposal?
I think its valuable to link to a frame, even while most frames hold some
sort of shape. There can be offsets involved which make the effect really
different.
On top of that; removing the option to link to frames doesn't seem
backwards compatible (old docs liking to frames would become invalid)
--
Thomas Zander
