Re: #6.8 - Errata Review

From
Patrick Durusau <>
Date
2008-09-15T15:38:07+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: #6.8 - Errata Review
Dennis,

Another question:

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

<snip>
>           ODF 1.0     IS 26300
> Section   page line   page line
>
>
>   
<snip>
> *9.5.3*  *330* *27*  *334* *29*  [under "T" *** missed ***, same as B and V]
>   
When you say "missed," do you mean not in the Japanese defect report?

If so, why would it appear in this errata document? (Note I am not 
disagreeing an error exists, but asking about the scope of this 
particular errata document.)

Hope you are having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)