On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:52 -0400, wrote:
> 6) If any TC member knows of an ODF 1.0 implementation that would require
> modification in order to remain compliant with the proposed schema change,
> then they should speak up and say so. We can always take this change out.
> But, for example, if implementations generally do not implement this
> attribute, or if they silently have already made the spelling correction
> in their implementations, then this may not be a problem. By having
> review on the TC as well as a 15-day public review, we give any
> implementation, whether represented on the TC or not, a fair opportunity
> to make this point.
What about ODF 1.0 implementations that do not exist yet? Is it
understood that any new ODF 1.0 implementation will have no follow the
errata?
Andreas
--
Andreas J. Guelzow <>
Andreas J. Guelzow
