We should probably track the conformance part of this as a new proposal.
We should also probably, perhaps with Patrick's assistance, see if there
are multiple synonyms which mean the same thing, and which should be
regularized.
I'm thinking implementation-defined, application-defined, vendor-defined,
implementation specific, implementation dependent, etc. I'm assuming
these are not all subtly different in intent but represent the same thing.
-Rob
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <> wrote on 10/30/2008
10:36:07 PM:
>
> I'm aligned with this too, along with Warren.
>
> It might be useful have a registry of such implementation-defined
attribute
> values so their specification can be widely known and possible addition
to
> the standard considered in the way that happens more deliberately.
>
> - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:]
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00164.html
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 01:47
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [office] preferred view mode upon opening document
>
> This sounds good to me. I only would like to add that whenever an
> implementor adds an implementation specific value and believes that
> other implementations could make reasonable use of it, that I then would
> strongly recommend to submit a proposal to the TC to standardize this
value.
>
> Michael
>
> On 29.10.08 22:09, wrote:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200810/msg00161.html
>
> [ ... ]
>
