OK, my 5 votes:
Jomar Silva
+1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/DSigProposal
Michael Brauer
+1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/Table-Protected
Dennis Hamilton
+1 http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ODF_1.2_Version_Significance
Ming Fei Jia
+1
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/add_list_level_attribute_to_style%3Astyle
+1
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/data_cache%2C_field_name_and_source_field_id_for_data_pilot_tables
Best Regards,
Mingfei Jia(樂隴滄)
IBM Lotus Symphony Development
IBM China Software Development LAB, Beijing
Tel: 86-10-82452493 Fax: 86-10-82452887
NOTES:Ming Fei Jia/China/IBM E-mail:
Address: No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No.8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
wrote on 12/11/2008 09:16:32 PM:
> From:
>
> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <>
>
> To:
>
> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <>
>
> Cc:
>
> OpenDocument Mailing List <>
>
> Date:
>
> 12/11/2008 09:17 PM
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [office] Please read: Procedure proposal for ODF 1.2 proposals
>
> Sent by:
>
>
>
> The list of proposals that have been requested for consideration for ODF
> 1.2 is this:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200812/msg00089.html
>
> Michael
>
> On 12/11/08 11:59 AM, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
> > Dear TC members,
> >
> > the deadline for requesting proposals for consideration in ODF 1.2 has
> > passed.
> >
> > The consideration of 16 proposals has been requested. We have 6 TC
> > members that requested the inclusion of at least one proposal, and the
> > number of requests per TC members varies between 1 and 7.
> >
> > The assumption for the schedule we agreed in the last TC call was that
> > we have 5 requests, and we agreed to make a decision how to proceed in
> > the next call if the number of requests is above 5. We got 16 requests.
> > We therefore need to decide now how to proceed.
> >
> > I have discussed the situation with Rob, and this what we would like to
> > propose:
> >
> > 1) All TC members with voting rights (a list is below) have 5 votes
> > that they can cast on any set of proposals. Voters can split their vote
> > among 5 different proposals, put all their 5 votes on a single proposal,
> > or divide them up in any way they choice, among the proposals listed.
> >
> > 2) This votes are cast by sending the vote allocations to the mailing
> > list before the TC meeting on Monday.
> >
> > 3) The votes themselves are non-binding until the TC, in the meeting on
> > Monday, the 15th of December, decides to give them a meaning.
> >
> > 4) In the meeting on Monday, the 15th of December, the TC votes to
> > consider those 5 or 6 (or another number to be decided on) proposals for
> > inclusion into ODF 1.2, that got the most votes.
> > Note: Five is the number of proposals we worked with in the last TC
> > call. Six is the number of TC members that have requested the
> > consideration of a proposal. Taking six proposals would mean that at
> > least in theory one proposal per TC member could be elected. We should
> > be able to process six proposals without changing the schedule.
> >
> > Using this approach, everyone has equal voice in what proposals are
> > processed.
> >
> > *While the TC needs to agree to give the votes described above a
> > meaning, I would like to ask all voting TC members to cast their votes
> > in order to make a good decision in the meeting on Monday.*
> >
> > Please note that the votes you are casting are not regarding the
> > proposals itself, but only whether they should be considered for ODF
> > 1.2.
> >
> > This means that the proposals that are considered for inclusion
> > still need to pass the proposal acceptance process successfully, which
> > is defined by our standing rule and the rules we agreed on the last TC
> > call.
> >
> > Vice versa, if a proposal that is not elected for consideration in
> > ODF 1.2, then this does not mean that the proposal itself is rejected,
> > and TC members should not interpret the votes that way. If a proposal is
> > not elected to be considered in ODF 1.2, then these proposals still
> > should be considered for a later version of ODF, and I would like to
> > encourage the TC members to advance such proposals to make sure they
> > will be considered in the next ODF version.
> >
> >
> > The following TC members have voting rights:
> >
> > Michael Brauer
> > Patrick Durusau
> > Dennis Hamilton
> > Mingfei Jia
> > Bob Jolliffe
> > Jun Ma
> > Doug Mahugh
> > Eric Patterson
> > Eike Rathke
> > Florian Reuter
> > Jomar Silva
> > Rob Weir
> > David Wheeler
> > Oliver Wittmann
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Michael
> >
>
>
> --
> Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
> StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
> Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55
> D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
> http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500
> http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
> D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
> Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
