Part 2?

Greetings!

Already proofing on part 1 and ran into an issue that may involve part 2.

In the introduction (1.1 in the current draft) we say:

> Part 2 defines a formula language for OpenDocument documents.
>
But that's not right is it?

Shouldn't it read:

"Part 2 defines *the* formula language for OpenDocument documents."

And then later under conformance, we will need to account for allowable 
values for text:formula and table: formula being defined by Part 2. Yes?

Hope everyone is having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)