← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Re: [office] Another view on conformance?

From
Dave Pawson <>
Date
2009-03-01T08:30:18+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [office] Another view on conformance?
2009/2/28  <>:

>> Weak definition, weak test. Your choice.
>>
>
> The point is not the definition of random.

It is, seems this is an example  what the TC won't accept.
The spec is weak, hence not verifiable.

Correct one, you'll address the other.


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread