Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [office] Metadata Fields
Title: Re: [office] Metadata Fields Has anyone documented mapping the Office metadata to other popular formats such as XMP and MS Office? Such a matrix might be useful for those who actually have to work with metadata on large scale systems. Duane On 4/14/09 2:06 AM, "Michael Stahl" <> wrote: hi Patrick, On 14/04/2009 02:36, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Greetings! > > A new issue that I had not previously noted. > > 6.5.1 – 6.5.19, inclusive. All the text in these sections refer to a > “document.” However, note that all these elements are children of > |<text:a>| 5.1.4, |<text:h>| 4.1.1, |<text:meta>| 5.1.5, > |<text:meta-field>| 6.5.19, |<text:p>| 4.1.2, |<text:ruby-base>| 5.4.1 > and |<text:span>| 5.1.3 elements. None of which represent documents. Yes, these field elements refer to the document that is being edited. Specifically, their contents come from the similarly-named elements in "meta.xml". > Could mean the document being edited, but then we would have to say that > all <text:initial-creator> elements, for instance, must have the same > value. Since that element may occur as a child of every <text:p> element. In principle, yes, all such elements would have the same contents. Except, for those that have the attribute text:fixed="true": these would have whatever content they had when the field was marked as fixed, which may well be different in different instances. > Could mean that the metadata in question applies to the elements specified. > > This problem also occurs with 6.3.6 – 6.3.11, and 6.3.2 – 6.3.5, inclusive. > > Options: > > 1. Say that the metadata fields apply to their parent elements. (Would > we need to say something about displaying those fields?) > > 2. Could change the schema to attach these fields to elements that > represent "documents." And to remove them from elements that don't. > (Note that this would not be backwards compatible.) > > I don't have a default position to suggest. I can't count the number of > times I have read this section and simply missed this issue. Well, these fields are intended for _displaying_ information in the content of the document, where the "canonical" version of the information is already contained at a well-defined location (meta.xml). So imho we already have option (2.), and i don't really see a problem here. > Apologies. > > Hope everyone is at the start of a great week! > > Patrick regards, michael -- Michael Stahl mailto: http://www.sun.de OpenOffice.org/StarOffice Writer Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55, 20097 Hamburg, Germany ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Next in thread →
Next in month →