← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

RE: [office] (OASIS Issue Tracker) Commented: (OFFICE-1700) Editor Note: Section 18.258 style:font-charset

From
Dennis E. Hamilton <>
Date
2009-06-15T22:54:56+00:00
ID
3BA2C1A9781F40AB9B0A4159B86E4B10@Scampo
Thread
RE: [office] (OASIS Issue Tracker) Commented: (OFFICE-1700) Editor Note: Section 18.258 style:font-charset
Patrick, my understanding of "resolved" in JIRA is that it means resolution has been *agreed*, "applied" in JIRA means, in my understanding, that the resolution has been implemented.

A brand new JIRA issue could contain a proposed resolution.  

I think we need to reaffirm exactly at what point something becomes resolved.

(There may be a special case around editorial matters where you get to declare something resolved.  In that case, I suppose, someone would need to open a new issue in order to object to your determination.)

 - Dennis 

-----Original Message-----
From: OASIS Issues Tracker [mailto:] 
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 14:22
To: 
Subject: [office] [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-1700) Editor Note: Section 18.258 style:font-charset


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=11901#action_11901 ] 

Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-1700:
-----------------------------------------

Sigh, all "resolution" means as used here is that a proposal has been made. Even if I "apply" the proposal, the issue has not yet be "closed." 

We have to somehow move the issues through JIRA. I look for "resolved" issue to consider the proposals and make further comments if it seems unclear to me or to need further discussion. 

Granted the process semantics aren't what I would choose starting from a blank slate, but that wasn't an option. 

[ ... ]
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread