2009/9/1 Bob Jolliffe <>:
> Thanks Ming Fei. You summarized my concerns much better than I ..
> By opening up the third option (implementation defined algorithms) we
> maximize the choice but, as Ming Fei says, we risk the standard having no
> meaning or relevance regarding encryption.
Implementation defined is the usual cop-out for 'not standardised'.
Yet another interop no no?
So to Robs question
3) Do we allow implementation-defined algorithms beyond those which we
have assigned identifiers to?
Definite no.
Try and develop a standard?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
