On 10/16/09 22:00, wrote:
> "Dennis E. Hamilton" <> wrote on 10/16/2009
> 03:36:28 PM:
>
> It is certainly reasonable to request that we "divide the question" into
> two ballots. But at this point it might just be faster to have the two
> votes on Monday's call.
Yes, that is an option as well.
> We'll need to make sure that we can make this distinction on JIRA as well.
> Maybe we need new "releases" defined in JIRA, for ODF12-PRD1-Part1 for
> the first public review of Part 1, and ODF12-PRD2-Part3 for the 2nd public
> review of Part 3, and eventually ODF12-PRD1-All for the 1st public review
> of all parts.
Right. That adds the versions to "affects version" and "fix for". I
think that works.
>
> Or is there a better way to do this?
>
>> - Dennis
>>
>> PS: And the current draft seems to be attracting public comments as it
> is.
>
> That's fine. I hope it attracts even more comments when it is out for
> public review. Remember, Part 3 is mainly pre-existing material and we've
> also processed changes for 4 years of public comments. So I think it is
> pretty good shape.
I agree. We had several drafts for part 3 available in the last two
months, so even if we did not approve it as a Committee Draft so far, it
is not a "new" draft. And while our committee draft already got some
attention outside the TC, the way to request comments from the public is
a public review.
Best regards
Michael
--
Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
Sun Microsystems GmbH Nagelsweg 55
D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
http://sun.com/staroffice +49 40 23646 500
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
