Second Errata comment

Greetings!

Another thought occurred to me about the responses in the second set of 
errata that are answered in the notes following the main text.

Shouldn't we incorporate those into the main body of the errata and 
repeat what the note already says but then say:

(for example):

Insert text:

"The semantics of the functions auto, average, count, countnums, max, 
min, product, stdev, stdevp, sum, var and varp are implementation 
dependent."

Since we did not define the semantics of these functions in ODF 1.0, 
that would not change anything substantive about the prior text to 
simply note that we did not define them.

Noting that generally the errata should not say "implementation defined" 
which is a different concept from "implementation dependent."

Hope everyone is having a great day!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau

Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)