Michael,
Switching the schema is a big step but I assume that there are tools to
measure formal equivalence of schemas?
I haven't looked, therefore the question.
If there were some assurance other than "eye balling" the two schemas, I
would feel more confident about a last minute change.
Hope you are looking forward to a great weekend!
Patrick
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
> Hi
>
> there are two JIRA issues I'd like to discuss in the next TC meeting:
>
> 1) http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2215
>
> The question here is whether or not we want to switch to XSD as schema
> language for the digital signature schema.
>
>
> 2) http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2214
>
> The question here is whether we want to make changes to the RNG schema
> right now, or for ODF-Next.
>
> We actually got a contribution for an ODF schema for part 1 that does
> not use the "combine" attribute:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/201002/msg00022.html
>
> However, changing the schema in the last minute of cause has some
> risks. The current schema is well tested, and while there have been
> changes for ODF 1.2, it is in use since ODF 1.0.
>
> So, maybe, we should just switch to a new schema structure as first
> action for ODF 1.3/2.0 rather than the last one for ODF 1.2?
>
> Michael
>
>
--
Patrick Durusau
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
