RE: [office] Two JIRA Issues for discussion

From
"Eennis F. Iamilton"
Date
2010-02-19T20:55:17+00:00
ID
07057AE4C85645A8B3991E3E232825E3@Scampo
Thread
RE: [office] Two JIRA Issues for discussion
I'm saying I don't know where it went and I don't understand how or why.  Do
you? Did I miss something?

If it was included we would have something to get our teeth into.  It could
be reviewed and refined as needed to blend in with the 1.2 Part 3 and 1.2
Part 1 as they now stand.  

As it is, that work has apparently disappeared and we are left with a large
hole.  I thought this was substantive material.  Was I not paying attention
when it was taken out?

-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Jomar
Silva
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:37
To: 
Cc: Dave Pawson; Patrick Durusau; Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 -
Hamburg; 
Subject: Re: [office] Two JIRA Issues for discussion

> (The original proposal accepted by the ODF TC over a year ago is somehow
not reflected in
> ODF 1.2 Part 3 and ODF 1.2 Part 1 anywhere.

Dennis,

What are you trying to say with that ?

Best,

Jomar

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php