ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent
office · February 2010 · 8 messages · back to month
| # | Subject | From | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00007 | ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | Dennis E. Hamilton | 2010-02-01 15:51 |
| 00008 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | [email protected] | 2010-02-01 16:04 |
| 00009 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | Mary McRae | 2010-02-01 16:16 |
| 00010 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | [email protected] | 2010-02-01 17:01 |
| 00011 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | Mary McRae | 2010-02-01 18:41 |
| 00012 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | Patrick Durusau | 2010-02-01 18:55 |
| 00013 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | Mary McRae | 2010-02-01 19:01 |
| 00014 | Re: [office] ODF 1.0 and IS 26300 not technically equivalent | [email protected] | 2010-02-01 19:10 |