← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2287) BETADIST[NEEDS-DISCUSSION]

From
OASIS Issues Tracker <>
Date
2010-03-18T18:35:15+00:00
ID
110300317.40041268937315441.JavaMail.tomcat55@mw00
Thread
[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-2287) BETADIST[NEEDS-DISCUSSION]
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18050#action_18050 ] 

Andreas Guelzow  commented on OFFICE-2287:
------------------------------------------

Eike, I thought we were not giving algorithms intended for implementation. If we do we should determine whether any of the two formulas is in fact useful for implementation. I believe an implementor should on their own determine which in their circumstances is the best implementaion formula.

A mathematician would never give to definitions for the same term. (And a standard is not the place for theorems.)

> BETADIST [NEEDS-DISCUSSION]
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-2287
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2287
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: OpenFormula
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Andreas Guelzow 
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 2 CD 2
>
>
> == 6.17.7. BETADIST ==
> I miss the factor 1/(b-a) in the density case, see 
> http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda366h.htm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread