RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

From
<>
Date
2010-03-30T23:36:20+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <> wrote on 03/30/2010 
06:52:29 PM:

> 
> Good, I forgot about the reconciliation approach from the older 
discussions.
> 
> Is it good enough for the FPDAM to be prepared against IS 26300:2006 as 
it
> is now, before the DCORi are finalized, and sync it all in the
> reconciliation?
> 

I think we have a choice of 3 initial texts we could do the initial diff 
from:

A) ISO/IEC 26300
B) ISO/IEC 26300 + COR 1
C) ISO/IEC 26300 + COR 2

I don't think we want to wait for C to happen, since the DCOR ballot has 
not yet started, and we still need to make some more changes on the OASIS 
side and have another 15 day review.  So COR 2 is at least 4 months away. 

We could wait for COR 1 and option B) if we wanted, since the ballot for 
that has ended and we know what those corrections are.

Or we could do option A.  I think that is what Patrick's initial diff was.

I don't have a strong opinion on A versus B. 

-Rob