Hi Michael,
On Friday, 2010-05-07 07:20:35 +0000, Michael Brauer wrote:
> This is the non-editor version of OpenDocument v1.2 part 2 draft 27. See
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-formula/201005/msg00011.html
>
> Please note that this draft actually should be names
> OpenDocument-v1.2-cd02-rev02. I did not rename it this time to avoid
> confusion, but we should use the official naming pattern from now on.
Does that mean that for the subcommittee's editor revision drafts we
should also adopt the naming pattern? If yes, to what? Next would be
OpenDocument-v1.2-part2-cd03-rev01
in case the current version was accepted as CD03? And
OpenDocument-v1.2-part2-cd02-rev03
in case we needed another draft before CD03?
Note also part2 in the name to not confuse it with other parts.
Eike
--
OpenOffice.org / StarOffice Calc core developer and i18n transpositionizer.
SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
