[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael Brauer updated OFFICE-2638:
-----------------------------------
Affects Version/s: ODF 1.2 CD 05
(was: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5)
> 19.511 style:rel-height - scale-min definition is unclear
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-2638
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-2638
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Text
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.2 CD 05
> Reporter: Patrick Durusau
> Assignee: Patrick Durusau
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: ODF 1.2 Part 1 CD 5
>
>
> The value scale-min now reads:
> "scale-min: equals the value scale, except that the calculated width or height is a minimum height rather than an absolute one."
> The value scale reads:
> "scale: the height should be calculated depending on the width, so that the ratio of width and height of the original image or object size is preserved."
> I was replacing the "equals" in scale-min when I noticed that "...is a minimum height rather than an absolute one." isn't meaningful.
> Nor does it make much sense to say that "...the calculated width or height is a minimum height.." Both width and height are a minimum height?
> Is the purpose to say that the original ratio of the original object size is not preserved? (implementation dependent?)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
