In the main specification:
1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocument-v1.1.html
2. Section 1 must include terminology and at a minimum a normative reference to either RFC 2119 or the related ISO reference.
In Part 1:
1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocument-v1.1.html
2. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be activated.
In Part 2:
1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocument-v1.1.html
2. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be activated.
In Part 3:
1. In the previous version section, the link to the html file is broken. It should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.1/OS/OpenDocument-v1.1-html/OpenDocument-v1.1.html
2. Activate trademark link at bottom of Notices
3. All hypertext links in normative and non-normative references must be activated.
4. Appendix A is empty?
Also, it should be noted that the ballot to approve as CD and submit for public review is invalid and will need to be conducted again (or approved by a full majority vote in a TC meeting). The OASIS TC Process requires that all TC ballots be set to include votes of 'yes', 'no', and 'abstain'; this ballot was set to yes / no only.
As soon as we updated copies and a new minutes or ballot reference, we'll proceed with the review.
Regards,
Mary
Mary P McRae
Director, Standards Development
Technical Committee Administrator
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
email:
web: www.oasis-open.org
twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen
phone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
