[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19643#action_19643 ]
Dennis Hamilton commented on OFFICE-1805:
-----------------------------------------
The wording for the "filter" case may need to be adjusted depending on what is supposed to happen if there is no filter condition. That is, it is only visible if a filter selects it or is it only invisible if there is a filter and it fails to select the row.
Or is it stranger than that and the filter case is implementation-dependent?
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 N 1078 : DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-13
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFFICE-1805
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1805
> Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: ODF 1.0, ODF 1.0 (second edition), ODF 1.0 Errata 02
> Reporter: Robert Weir
> Assignee: Svante Schubert
> Fix For: ODF 1.0 Errata CD 5
>
>
> Transcribed from http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1078.htm
> Original author: "MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <>
> DEFECT REPORT NUMBER JP2-13
> QUALIFIER clarification required
> REFERENCES IN DOCUMENT "Visibility", Clause 8.1.2
> NATURE OF DEFECT Is the second occurrence of the word "invisible" in "Collapsed rows have been made invisible by invisible in the UI directly." unnecessary?
> SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE SUBMITTER
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
