"Andreas J. Guelzow" <> wrote on 07/15/2010
05:02:41 PM:
> >
> (...)
> > In any case, I'll likely vote against adding new features at this
point
> > unless there is something of extraordinary importance.
>
> Of course there is an argument to be made that this isn't a proposal to
> add a feature but to correct an omission. office:annotation already
> exists it is currently just not allowed in the suggested place, although
> surely some TC members believed that office:annotation can occur in any
> content.
>
I'm certainly open to that argument.
-Rob
